From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12986 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2003 20:03:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12979 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 20:03:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO octopussy.utanet.at) (213.90.36.45) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2003 20:03:03 -0000 Received: from pam.utanet.at ([213.90.36.6]) by octopussy.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 192zJ6-0003pq-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 22:03:00 +0200 Received: from dsl-238-209.utaonline.at ([212.152.238.209] helo=rotty-ipv4.yi.org) by pam.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 192zJ6-0008PI-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 22:03:00 +0200 Received: from alice.rhinosaur.lan ([192.168.1.3] ident=mail) by rotty-ipv4.yi.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 192zE1-0000gE-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 21:57:45 +0200 Received: from andy by alice.rhinosaur.lan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 192zE1-0001k9-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 21:57:45 +0200 To: Stan Pinte Cc: Ariel Rios , wingo@pobox.com, mvo@zagadka.de, guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al References: <20030407144511.GA1489@lark> <1049743589.1933.21.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx> <20030408163225.24531f44.stan@altosw.be> From: Andreas Rottmann Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 20:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030408163225.24531f44.stan@altosw.be> Message-ID: <871y0clq2u.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 Stan Pinte writes: [quote of Ariel, confusing me about wether there is 2.0 porting work at all] > hello, > > I would really like to start using the gnome-canvas with > guile-1.6.3, and guile-gtk-1.2.31 > > can anyone point me to the easiest way to do it? > > shall I merge the old sources coming from the gnome-guile project in > the Gnome CVS? shall I rewrite a binding from scratch using g-wrap? > > thanks a lot for guidance, > I really wonder why so few people seem interested in GTK+ 2.0 bindings. I'd love to have Goops-based bindings for 2.0 (OO is really nice, if not necessary ;-) when dealing with widget sets IMO), and could lend a hand from time to time. Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 It's GNU/Linux dammit!