I checked in my bit of texinfo manual. It's got all the notes and exceptions I think need mentioning, if there's anything missing it's probably because I didn't know about it :-). I might drop a couple of bits from the README now covered in greater detail, the Documentation section at the end and probably the Installing section.
I wrote:
>
> I checked in my bit of texinfo manual.
I added a bit more to it, a couple of functions I'd missed, and a bit
about problems with primitive-exit when forking.
Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au> writes:
> I wrote:
>>
>> I checked in my bit of texinfo manual.
>
> I added a bit more to it, a couple of functions I'd missed, and a bit
> about problems with primitive-exit when forking.
That reminds me: I changed the title from "Gtk Guile" to "Guile-Gtk",
since that is the name of the package. Since you also refer to
gtk-guile.info in the @dircategory line, I guess you were merely
confused a bit, and the "Gtk Guile" title wasn't intentional. Is that
right?
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de> writes: > > That reminds me: I changed the title from "Gtk Guile" to "Guile-Gtk", > since that is the name of the package. No worries. Did you want to search and replace that everywhere in the text? > Since you also refer to > gtk-guile.info in the @dircategory line, I guess you were merely > confused a bit, and the "Gtk Guile" title wasn't intentional. Is that > right? Yep, a few places left over from starting with it the wrong way around.
Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au> writes:
> Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de> writes:
>>
>> That reminds me: I changed the title from "Gtk Guile" to "Guile-Gtk",
>> since that is the name of the package.
>
> No worries. Did you want to search and replace that everywhere in the
> text?
Yes, I think I've found all the places. Should we go ahead and name
it "Guile-Gtk-1.2"?
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de> writes:
>
> Should we go ahead and name it "Guile-Gtk-1.2"?
Hmm, my first thought would be no, that just "Guile-Gtk" is enough
since the version requirements/limitations are spelt out clearly.
But if this stuff is basically a dead end then it may as well be given
a name that emphasises the deadness.