From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32320 invoked by alias); 26 May 2003 00:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32271 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 00:06:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO snoopy.pacific.net.au) (61.8.0.36) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 May 2003 00:06:23 -0000 Received: from sunny.pacific.net.au (sunny.pacific.net.au [203.2.228.40]) by snoopy.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.3) with ESMTP id h4Q06LPB018265 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 10:06:22 +1000 Received: from wisma.pacific.net.au (wisma.pacific.net.au [210.23.129.72]) by sunny.pacific.net.au with ESMTP id h4Q06LQg024154 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 10:06:21 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (ppp29.dyn228.pacific.net.au [203.143.228.29]) by wisma.pacific.net.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4Q06JYZ005037 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 10:06:20 +1000 (EST) Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19K5VC-0000S0-00; Mon, 26 May 2003 10:06:10 +1000 To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: texinfo documentation References: <87llxd2c59.fsf@zip.com.au> <874r3lmifw.fsf@zip.com.au> <87of1tjjwy.fsf@zip.com.au> <87znldi1wl.fsf@zip.com.au> <87el2mmymo.fsf@zip.com.au> From: Kevin Ryde Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 00:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Marko Rauhamaa's message of "25 May 2003 16:19:56 -0700") Message-ID: <87smr2lgge.fsf@zip.com.au> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 Marko Rauhamaa writes: > > `app' > This global symbol is reserved by guile. Don't define it. Yep, beaut. > Since gdk-gc-set-clip-rectangle was added recently by me (following > existing examples), I could change it to take a rectangle. I think the function called gdk-gc-set-clip-rectangle should be the same as the corresponding C function. By all means add some extra routine if the basic way is too painful, but I think variations between C and scheme functions (of the same name) will only serve to cause confusion.