From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26220 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 20:15:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26213 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2003 20:15:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO octopussy.utanet.at) (213.90.36.45) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2003 20:15:12 -0000 Received: from plenty.utanet.at ([213.90.36.9]) by octopussy.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 192d1H-0007rB-00; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 22:15:07 +0200 Received: from dsl-158-93.utaonline.at ([62.218.158.93] helo=rotty-ipv4.yi.org) by plenty.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 192d1G-0000p7-00; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 22:15:06 +0200 Received: from alice.rhinosaur.lan ([192.168.1.3] ident=mail) by rotty-ipv4.yi.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 192d09-0002Ok-00; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 22:13:57 +0200 Received: from andy by alice.rhinosaur.lan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 192czz-00059Y-00; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 22:13:47 +0200 To: Ariel Rios Cc: mvo@zagadka.de, guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com, Stan Pinte Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al References: <20030407144511.GA1489@lark> <1049743589.1933.21.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx> From: Andreas Rottmann Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 20:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1049743589.1933.21.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx> Message-ID: <87smsunk04.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Ariel Rios writes: > On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 09:45, Andy Wingo wrote: > > Hi Ariel, > > > > I'm real interested in getting the guile-gtk bindings in a proper > > working order. I'm interested on a number of levels, but mainly because > > I'd like to make some nice GStreamer scheme bindings. I've been hacking > > on the cvs guile-gobject, fixed a bug in guile 1.6.3 along the way, and > > have generally been having a good time. I wanted to give you a heads-up > > on this; when I get my defs->gwrap code working properly I'll send you a > > large patch. > > > Ok. I'd been receiving some comments and want to put things back in > order. I am very happy that interest in guile-gobject has aroused so if > we work together we can have the bindigs working correctly very soon. > > We have several code base. We have several modules: > > guile-gtk: Currently on savanah forGtk1.4 > gnome-guile: Also on savanah for Gnome 1.4 (??) > guile-gobect: Still under gnome CVS and ioncludes the work for GTk 1.4 > > The first branch is being worked by Marius. I think no one is working > ong the gnome-guile. > > All the interesing work is donde under guile-gobect > AFAIK, there is no GTK+ 1.4 (only GTK+ 1.2 and 2.{0,2} as of yet). GTK+ 2.4 will follow and will break API again, but not as hard as 1.2-2.0. Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.