From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1874 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2003 16:58:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1867 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2003 16:58:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO octopussy.utanet.at) (213.90.36.45) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Aug 2003 16:58:02 -0000 Received: from patricia.utanet.at ([213.90.36.8]) by octopussy.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19jien-0006Zc-00 for guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:58:01 +0200 Received: from dsl-159-3.utaonline.at ([62.218.159.3] helo=rotty-ipv4.yi.org) by patricia.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19jiel-0000zl-00 for guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:58:00 +0200 Received: from alice.rhinosaur.lan ([192.168.1.3] ident=mail) by rotty-ipv4.yi.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19jifE-0000S3-00 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:58:28 +0200 Received: from andy by alice.rhinosaur.lan with local (Exim 4.20) id 19jifE-0000YD-85 for guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:58:28 +0200 To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Compiling guile-gobject experiences References: <87ptjornbn.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <20030804162116.GA1217@lark> From: Andreas Rottmann Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030804162116.GA1217@lark> (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:21:16 +0100") Message-ID: <87wudttl57.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Andy Wingo writes: > On Sat, 02 Aug 2003, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > >> I've just tried a rebuild of a new guile-gobject CVS checkout. The >> build takes extremly long (I've cancelled it, after my machine started >> heavy trashing). The problem is the generated guile-gnome-gw-gtk.c, >> which has 154075 lines (:-O). > > This happens for me too, but only on gcc-3.3. If you try make with > gcc-3.2 (and even better with CC='ccache gcc-3.2'), the problem isn't > near so bad. > > And my machine is low-end, these days anyway: a celeron 600 with 192 > megs of ram. > > But I do agree that it's a problem. I think reducing the size of the > generated code is the best solution, personally. > > I'm glad to hear that you're compiling the code :-) I'd be pleased to > have you on as a co-maintainer if you're still interested. My internet > connection is spotty, and I'm about to go on holiday in a couple weeks, > for the record. > Yes, I'm still interested (and have an ADSL connection :-), at least until October, when I'll probably move to Vienna). How should we go on about g-wrap? We really should have a CVS repository of it, so since Rob Browning isn't responsive, we maybe should set one up on savannah in the guile-gtk project temporarily[0]? Regards, Andy [0] Yes, I know forks are bad, but as a temporary measure... -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Python is executable pseudocode, Perl is executable line-noise.