From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23776 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2003 04:48:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23733 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2003 04:48:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO telltronics.org) (66.93.240.80) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2003 04:48:00 -0000 Received: from localhost (tell@localhost) by telltronics.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04453 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:47:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 04:48:00 -0000 From: Steve Tell X-Sender: tell@ariel.lan.telltronics.org To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al In-Reply-To: <20030408161816.599d8e99.david@altosw.be> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, David Pirotte wrote: > > I really wonder why so few people seem interested in GTK+ 2.0 > > bindings. I'd love to have Goops-based bindings for 2.0 (OO is really > > nice, if not necessary ;-) when dealing with widget sets IMO), and > > could lend a hand from time to time. > > I really really would like to have goops-based any bindings, but Gtk+ 2.0 > would be a must, I backup the idea I'm interested in gtk+-2.0 (without requiring gnome) bindings also, and not only becaused I've been asked when some code of mine will build work with gtk+-2.0/2.2. Not knowing much about goops yet, what would such bindings look like? I'd prefer to have somthing that is largely code-compatible with the current guile-gtk for gtk+-1.2. Idealy I'd like a single guile+C codebase to be able to support both gtk+-1.2 and gtk+2.x for some transition period. It looks like this is reasonably straightforward for pure C uses of gtk+. Sounds like guile-gobject from gnome is the best way to proceed in this direction. Or is there somthing else I should download, test, and try to help with? Steve -- Steve Tell tell@telltronics.org