From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15074 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2003 10:34:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15043 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 10:34:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) (129.217.163.1) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2003 10:34:32 -0000 Received: from burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.19]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB34A381D; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:34:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id AA83739E67; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:34:52 +0200 (CEST) To: Andreas Rottmann Cc: Ariel Rios , guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com, Stan Pinte Subject: Re: (gnome gtk) et al References: <20030407144511.GA1489@lark> <1049743589.1933.21.camel@tosca.elektra.com.mx> <87smsunk04.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> From: Marius Vollmer Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 10:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87smsunk04.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Andreas Rottmann writes: > AFAIK, there is no GTK+ 1.4 (only GTK+ 1.2 and 2.{0,2} as of > yet). Yes, what I am working on are bindings for Gtk+1.2, only.