From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31474 invoked by alias); 24 May 2003 00:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact guile-gtk-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: guile-gtk-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31453 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 00:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lumo.pacujo.net) (209.77.185.85) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 May 2003 00:05:45 -0000 Received: (from marko@localhost) by lumo.pacujo.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) id h4NNuxu31366; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:56:59 -0700 To: guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: texinfo documentation References: <87llxd2c59.fsf@zip.com.au> <874r3lmifw.fsf@zip.com.au> <87of1tjjwy.fsf@zip.com.au> From: Marko Rauhamaa Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 00:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87of1tjjwy.fsf@zip.com.au> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 Kevin Ryde : > Marko Rauhamaa writes: > > > > I'm sorry but I don't understand that comment. What "documented > > interfaces" are you talking about, > > The functions and variables that an application programmer using > guile-gtk will utilize. How they work internally doesn't matter, not > directly. Ah, ok. I mentioned this to Marius, and he expressed the wish that it should be enough to read the GTK+ C library documentation. But at least the existing deviations should be noted. Marko -- Marko Rauhamaa mailto:marko@pacujo.net http://pacujo.net/marko/