From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7940 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2008 16:52:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 7103 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2008 16:50:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <47BDAB48.6000103@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:52:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: terptom CC: insight-announce@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Bug database cleaning References: <47BCD137.3020806@redhat.com> <000401c87496$d052c1a0$6501a8c0@DadsDell> In-Reply-To: <000401c87496$d052c1a0$6501a8c0@DadsDell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact insight-announce-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-announce-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 terptom wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Seitz" > To: ; "insight" > {snip} >> I just seldom use the bug database > {snip} >> the bug database is quite a bit larger than it should be. > {snip} > > Could those two things *possibly* be related??? Are you offering to help? > People are much less likely to put in a 'fresh' bug report if an entry is already in the bug-base. > > Q: "When is a problem not a problem?" > > A: "When I ignore it for more than a year." > > Bugs die of lonliness when left uncorrected? Let me restate: Does any one mind if I close bugs which I cannot reproduce in CVS HEAD and are in released versions of insight older than a year-ish (aka anything earlier than 6.6 or maybe 6.5). I apologize for being a big vague. Keith