public inbox for insight-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas.Swanson@compaq.com
To: insight-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: insight/123: Stepping into a void function and then Finishing it causes Insight to malfunction
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020128172710.17572.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)


>Number:         123
>Category:       insight
>Synopsis:       Stepping into a void function and then Finishing it causes Insight to malfunction
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Jan 28 09:33:00 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Douglas.Swanson@compaq.com
>Release:        unknown-1.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
Win2K / MinGW 2.95.3 / Gdb 5 / Insight 
>Description:
I attach a small program that illustrates the failure.
In a Dos window I compile this program with MinGW (2.95.3).
I invoke Insight and step into (s) update().  After a 
few iterations of the nested "for" loops I finish (f)
update().  Insight correctly highlights the invocation
in main(), but now if I try to continue (c) nothing
happens.

I have a larger program from which this small example
was derived.  In that program after Insight returns to
the invocation of update() subsequent next (n) commands
provoke the following dialog box.

Warning
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

Note:
 1) Running the same executable under native gdb does
not provoke this problem.
 2) If I do not step into (s) the void function and
finish (f) it, the problem does not occur.
>How-To-Repeat:
Please see Description
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


             reply	other threads:[~2002-01-28 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-28  9:33 Douglas.Swanson [this message]
2002-02-12 17:00 kseitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020128172710.17572.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=douglas.swanson@compaq.com \
    --cc=insight-gnats@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).