From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1060 invoked by alias); 7 May 2006 02:43:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1043 invoked by uid 71); 7 May 2006 02:43:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 02:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060507024301.1042.qmail@sourceware.org> To: kseitz@sources.redhat.com Cc: insight-prs@sources.redhat.com, From: Masaki Muranaka Subject: Re: insight/295: DESTDIR support to tcl Reply-To: Masaki Muranaka Mailing-List: contact insight-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-prs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR insight/295; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Masaki Muranaka To: insight-gnats@sources.redhat.com Cc: Subject: Re: insight/295: DESTDIR support to tcl Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:34:46 +0900 Hello, Kseitz. > I'm confused. Why can you not use --prefix and --exec-prefix? DESTDIR is used to install the another (temporary) place. It mainly used for build a binary package. Some tools embed prefix information in its source code, for example...GCC. I'm not sure if the embedding is done in tcl/ code, but it' possible the another package in sources.redhat.com does. So I hesitate using --prefix. > I've never even heard of the DESTDIR hack before. Please check diffs between GNU gettext 0.10.35 and 0.10.36. And also binutils http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2003-01/msg00018.html -- Masaki Muranaka Monami software