From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19476 invoked by alias); 16 May 2005 13:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19262 invoked from network); 16 May 2005 13:39:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bowmore.compxs.com) (81.136.16.5) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 May 2005 13:39:45 -0000 Received: from Kindrogan ([192.168.189.13]) by bowmore.compxs.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id j4GDefYI031014; Mon, 16 May 2005 14:40:51 +0100 Reply-To: From: "Jon Beniston" To: , Cc: Subject: RE: Insight and Licencing of TCL/TK Code Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <004c01c55a1c$9708af00$0dbda8c0@Kindrogan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <200505161330.j4GDUaFL020683@monster.franklin.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 > > > >> Certainly if I were to submit TCL/TK code (which the way > im going, im about to), i would not be assigning it's > copyright to Redhat. > > See: > > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/why-assign.html > Maybe he'd be happy to assign it to the FSF, but not to RedHat. Cheers, Jon