From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27701 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 20:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27693 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 20:48:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 20:48:10 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0TKIlf03375 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:18:47 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0TKmAa16737; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:48:10 -0500 Received: from [150.1.200.14] (vpn50-33.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.33]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0TKm9C24103; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:48:09 -0500 Subject: Re: current version from CVS fails build From: Keith Seitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Fred Fish , Chris Faylor , "insight@sources.redhat.com" In-Reply-To: <3E383C90.7020508@redhat.com> References: <200301292011.h0TKBKdo006048@public.ninemoons.com> <3E383C90.7020508@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1043873489.1503.60.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:48:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:41, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hmm, > > The reason for not removing it was source navigator. Didn't that > project move its repository? All the links in the SN page on sources.redhat.com point to sourceforge. Although the download page (on sourceforge) does mention a CVS repository at sources.redhat.com, it also mentions one at sourceforge.net. I suspect that the recent tcl/tk 8.4 upgrade may have screwed them over. I hope that this was discussed between the groups. (Alas, I don't recall anything.) Of course, I still don't understand why insight's module list must contain tix. We're done with it (at long last). Keith