From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5965 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 00:31:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5946 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2003 00:31:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 00:31:05 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2B0V5Q16138; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:31:05 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2B0V5V12941; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:31:05 -0500 Received: from dragon (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2B0V2S19652; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:31:03 -0500 Subject: Re: [toplevel patch] delete references to tix From: "Martin M. Hunt" To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Andrew Cagney , Nathanael Nerode , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, "insight@sources.redhat.com" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dj@redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <20030310182220.GA461@doctormoo> <1047323650.1149.1.camel@Dragon> <1047327075.1136.18.camel@Dragon> <3E6D097F.2010001@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1047342666.13437.16.camel@Dragon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 16:20, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 10, 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > It only occures if, at some future stage, a binutils or gcc > > containing this change is made before GDB. > > Right. > > > Besides, such edge conditions should be covered by the CrossGCC FAQ > > (has that really not been changed in >3 years?). > > It moved to a Wiki base, IIRC. > > Anyway, I don't see the point of removing support for building > packages from the tree. I can still legitimately want to build Tix > along with Tcl, Tk and Itcl. IMHO, the fact that the tools in src no > longer use Tix doesn't imply, to me, that the infrastructure to build > Tix should no longer be there. It costs very little (or nothing) to > keep it working. Just so we're clear on this, you can only build tix with old releases of the tools, along with old tcl/tk, etc. Tix hasn't been buildable out of CVS for months and has been removed for that reason and because it was no longer used. Martin