From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <insight-return-4881-listarch-insight=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25312 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2004 16:30:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:insight-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/insight/>
List-Post: <mailto:insight@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:insight-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25304 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2004 16:30:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2004 16:30:26 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i52GUQi5002821
	for <insight@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:30:26 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i52GUQ032557;
	Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:30:26 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i52GUPGA003295;
	Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:30:25 -0400
Subject: Re: problem building 6.1 for powerpc on cygwin
From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: Marc Schafer <mschafer@avidyne.com>
Cc: "insight@sources.redhat.com" <insight@sources.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <004a01c448b6$b50fdd20$0b01a8c0@maestrale>
References: <004a01c448b6$b50fdd20$0b01a8c0@maestrale>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1086193917.2747.11.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:30:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2

On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 08:31, Marc Schafer wrote:
> I am trying to build insight 6.1 for powerpc-eabi but it is failing in
> the tk build.  It appears that it is looking for X.  I have built
> older versions under cygwin and I thought X was not required.  It
> generates hundreds of errors, but here is a snippet.

You are correct: X is not required for cygwin, and it does look like it
is looking for X stuff.

Do you have the output of your run of configure?

I'm pretty sure that I've built this within the last few weeks... Maybe
a snapshot would be worth investigating?

Keith