From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1546 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2005 19:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1531 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2005 19:53:26 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:53:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j56JrPMe012527 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:53:25 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j56JrPO29483; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:53:25 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j56JrOOU028222; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:53:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch/ping] Problem with "file" command from CVS_HEAD From: Keith Seitz To: Steven Johnson Cc: "insight@sources.redhat.com" In-Reply-To: <42A58351.7090608@sakuraindustries.com> References: <42896CAD.60504@sakuraindustries.com> <4289CFD6.6040306@sakuraindustries.com> <1116286740.4493.9.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <428A79EE.4080307@sakuraindustries.com> <42A58351.7090608@sakuraindustries.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1118087604.4531.80.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 00:21 -1100, Steven Johnson wrote: > Posted some time ago, a frinedly ping :) I think I said a while ago that I wasn't really happy with not displaying internal errors. I would strongly prefer the warning be marked ignorable. Actually, we should change show_warning to ALWAYS check for an ignorable warning. That said, I will commit the other part of the patch, which has nothing to do with this warning stuff. Keith