From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8306 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2011 14:22:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 8297 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2011 14:22:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp172.iad.emailsrvr.com (HELO smtp172.iad.emailsrvr.com) (207.97.245.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:22:31 +0000 Received: from smtp37.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp37.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B5E253B1698; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:22:30 -0500 (EST) X-SMTPDoctor-Processed: csmtpprox 2.7.4 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp37.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AB9A23B0BC9; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:22:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by smtp37.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: bbalban-AT-b-labs.com) with ESMTPSA id F1E383B170A; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:22:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Next Release Status From: Bahadir Balban To: keiths@redhat.com Cc: insight@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1323958948.4820.8.camel@bbalban-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q4/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 Hi Keith/Christopher, > On 11/08/2011 04:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Actually, I've been able to build this without much effort. I just > don't like the current state of affairs wrt cygwin tcl/tk and insight so > I haven't been motivated to make a release. Would you please share instructions on how to build Insight against GDB-7.x? We are using it in fashion of ICE debugging with QEMU and gdb-6.8 seem to have debug issues with recent toolchains. I would appreciate a new release. > > PS. I would be willing to offer up new insight packages for cygwin. I > don't know how often I will be doing releases from here on out, > though. Insight must eventually be replaced by something more robust > and easier to build/use/develop. The other 2 options to Insight that we have seen are DDD and Eclipse. I think neither are good replacements. Insight is just very fast and easier to use than both. > > > PPS. Yes, we should discuss the "current state of affairs wrt cygwin > tcl/tk". I would like to attempt to sort this out -- at least for us > sourceware people. We don't use cygwin at all. Plain debugging of a remote QEMU ARM target in linux. Regards, Bahadir