From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14840 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 21:19:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14799 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2001 21:19:15 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 13:22:00 -0000 From: Grant Edwards To: Keith Seitz Cc: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: No step button using insight w/ remote target. Message-ID: <20011119152352.A27096@visi.com> References: <20011119150837.A27007@visi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from keiths@cygnus.com on Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:05:19PM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:05:19PM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Grant Edwards wrote: > > > Yes. After that line has been executed: > > > > (gdb) print inferior_ptid > > $1 = {pid = 42000, lwp = 0, tid = 0} > > Ok, so someone is resetting it somewhere... Can you find out > who that is? Maybe... I tried setting a watchpoint after it was initialized by remote_open_1, but execution is so slow, I don't know if the serial protocol is going to work. It doesn't look like it, but I'm going to give it a while longer. If you've got some suggestions for likely suspects, I could set some breakpoints instead of using a watchpoint. -- Grant Edwards grante@visi.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Edwards To: Keith Seitz Cc: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: No step button using insight w/ remote target. Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011119152352.A27096@visi.com> References: <20011119150837.A27007@visi.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/msg00339.html Message-ID: <20011119131900.71oWvXEo3JYbKiqpD22wDKSwrDy4Uvh5OEIqqLbXUcg@z> On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:05:19PM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Grant Edwards wrote: > > > Yes. After that line has been executed: > > > > (gdb) print inferior_ptid > > $1 = {pid = 42000, lwp = 0, tid = 0} > > Ok, so someone is resetting it somewhere... Can you find out > who that is? Maybe... I tried setting a watchpoint after it was initialized by remote_open_1, but execution is so slow, I don't know if the serial protocol is going to work. It doesn't look like it, but I'm going to give it a while longer. If you've got some suggestions for likely suspects, I could set some breakpoints instead of using a watchpoint. -- Grant Edwards grante@visi.com