From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15078 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 22:12:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14941 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2001 22:12:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 15:50:00 -0000 From: Grant Edwards To: Keith Seitz Cc: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: No step button using insight w/ remote target. Message-ID: <20011119161713.B27170@visi.com> References: <20011119152352.A27096@visi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from keiths@cygnus.com on Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:28:00PM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:28:00PM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Grant Edwards wrote: > > I tried setting a watchpoint after it was initialized by > > remote_open_1, but execution is so slow, I don't know if the > > serial protocol is going to work. It doesn't look like it, but > > I'm going to give it a while longer. > > Let me guess: you're not using an x86 with hardware watchpoints? Dunno. It's an AMD K6-400. The "watch" command didn't reply with a "hardware watchpoint" reply, so I guess not. Maybe I'll try on my PIII machine. -- Grant Edwards grante@visi.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Edwards To: Keith Seitz Cc: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: No step button using insight w/ remote target. Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20011119161713.B27170@visi.com> References: <20011119152352.A27096@visi.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/msg00341.html Message-ID: <20011119141200.TqblRBJaUjsfkj8IKqT9VxLvLDfgIWjMZNZQ3o7pDpA@z> On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:28:00PM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Grant Edwards wrote: > > I tried setting a watchpoint after it was initialized by > > remote_open_1, but execution is so slow, I don't know if the > > serial protocol is going to work. It doesn't look like it, but > > I'm going to give it a while longer. > > Let me guess: you're not using an x86 with hardware watchpoints? Dunno. It's an AMD K6-400. The "watch" command didn't reply with a "hardware watchpoint" reply, so I guess not. Maybe I'll try on my PIII machine. -- Grant Edwards grante@visi.com