public inbox for insight@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, insight@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: Make cli-out follow gdb_stdout
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020722194126.GA8756@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D3C5A9D.2010409@ges.redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:18:53PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >I'm not thrilled with it myself.  Let me explain what I'm trying to do,
> >and let's see if we can come up with a better model.
> >
> >I have a function which temporarily redirects GDB's output.  How does
> >it do this?  Well, the best way seems to be to modify
> >gdb_std{out,err,log}.  But the old value of gdb_stdout is cached in the
> >cli_out object.
> 
> So the assertion:
> 
> 	global uiout->stream->ui_file == global gdb_stdout
> 
> doesn't hold :-(
> 
> >The two minimal solutions were the one above (using a ui_file**) or
> >hardcoding gdb_stdout (since that's the only thing it's ever used for
> >at present).  They're both a bit of a step backwards.  I could provide
> >methods to query and set the underlying stream of a ui_out object, but
> >the differences between the different ui_out objects make that a little
> >awkward.  Would that be better?
> 
> Both of those are still wrong.  The global gdb_stdout should be going 
> away replaced with some sort of explicitly parameterized i/o object. 
> That is why catch_exceptions() takes a ui_out.

Well, that's not helpful in the short term :P

What do you envision by explicitly parametrized i/o object?  I really
don't think that's a good idea.  It would have to be passed down all
the way to every target function which might want to print some kind of
output.  That's a lot of bulk for no visible gain; somewhere down the
road if we supported multiple instantiations of the gdb library, maybe,
but we're so far away from that that this sort of direction seems
futile, until we are at least passing an object cookie everywhere.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-22 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-17 11:30 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-22 11:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-22 11:21   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-22 12:18     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-22 12:41       ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-07-22 13:11         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-22 13:18           ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020722194126.GA8756@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=insight@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).