From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1067 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2002 15:42:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1059 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2002 15:42:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2002 15:42:33 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id A350B1B887; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:42:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 08:42:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Various problems and/or questions on Insight 5.2.1 Message-ID: <20020904154218.GF1284@redhat.com> Reply-To: insight@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: insight@sources.redhat.com References: <3D74EF68.5070405@netscape.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D74EF68.5070405@netscape.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 [Warning: Reply-To set to insight mailing list] On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:20:40PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >"Ugh. That means that more than just tcl and tk was messed >up by the "merge". [You know, I've often considered starting >over with the "port" to cygwin for 8.3 -- or with Mumit >Khan's work. It can't be nearly as botched as what we have >now.]" > >If you do go this course, might I recomend that you use >Cygwin/XFree for the gui front end? We really can't require people to install X in order to get a graphical debugger for cygwin. cgf