From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29011 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2002 18:51:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28997 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 18:51:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 18:51:44 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99IVvX13815 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:31:57 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99Iphf11815 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:51:43 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (romulus-int.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99Ipga13121; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:51:43 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Martin M. Hunt" Organization: Red Hat Inc To: Keith Seitz Subject: Re: [RFC] add gdbserver target Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: insight@sources.redhat.com References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200210091150.33420.hunt@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 09 October 2002 10:59 am, Keith Seitz wrote: > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Martin M. Hunt wrote: > > This patch adds a "GDBserver" target name to the target dialog. This is > > identical to a remote target, except it does not download, and it > > continues instead of running. > > Only one thing comes to mind... We only want gdbserver on natives, right? No. It is probably most commonly used for embedded linux cross development. > Cross debuggers would use something like libremote (or whatever they're > going to call it today). I think they would use whichever they prefer or were supplied with. I'd rather not get into that argument. > > Otherwise it seems perfectly reasonable. > Keith Actually, both gdbserver and libremote don't do downloads and therefore work properly with Insight (without using the console) when using the "GDBserver" target I added. I really don't want to change the name to GDBServer/libremote/rda. Maybe I'll just update the docs? -- Martin Hunt GDB Engineer Red Hat, Inc.