From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: insight@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Insight build problem on cygwin (tentative patch enclosed)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030217185921.GA29103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030217184819.GC7514@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:48:19PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>[reply-to set]
>On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:38:02PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>>- static const struct interp_procs tk_procs =
>>>- {
>>>- tk_init,
>>>- gdbtk_resume,
>>>- gdbtk_suspend,
>>>- gdbtk_exec,
>>>- gdbtk_prompt_p,
>>>- gdbtk_command_loop,
>>>- };
>>>-
>>>- interp_add (interp_new ("gdbtk", NULL, NULL, &tk_procs));
>>>-
>>
>>FYI,
>>
>>Removing from _initialize*() is wrong. Interpreters should only be
>>registered in _initialize*() function.
>>
>>I think the underlying problem is general confusion over the separation
>>of powers between interp_add() and interp_init().
>>
>>BTW, even with that NULL, it worked for me. Is there something cygwin
>>centric going on?
>
>Don't see how it could be. interp_set does this:
>
> uiout = interp->interpreter_out;
>
>So, at some point uiout becomes NULL. I wiped out my old non-working version
>so I can't give the specific instance right now but it seems obvious that this
>could happen. If you set interpreter_out to NULL and call interp_set at some
>point then uiout will be NULL.
The call which sets uiout to NULL is in captured_main, line 559. Just typing
"insight foo.exe" was enough for me to trigger the problem. You can also see
it if you type "insight" (which brings up a window) and then do a "File->Open".
cgf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-17 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-13 22:04 Insight build problem on cygwin Rolf Campbell
2003-02-13 22:43 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-15 22:11 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-17 16:27 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-17 16:49 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-17 17:04 ` Insight build problem on cygwin (tentative patch enclosed) Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 17:48 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-17 18:48 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 18:59 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 19:54 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-18 0:35 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-19 18:02 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-19 18:28 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-19 21:49 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-17 18:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-17 18:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-17 18:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 19:01 ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
2003-02-17 21:25 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-18 3:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-18 23:32 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-19 22:49 ` Insight build problem on cygwin Keith Seitz
2003-02-19 22:54 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-20 1:05 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-20 2:36 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-20 17:55 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-21 10:16 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030217185921.GA29103@redhat.com \
--to=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=insight@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).