From: ac131313@redhat.com (Andrew Cagney)
To: insight@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Insight build problem on cygwin (tentative patch enclosed)
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 03:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030218014014.AAA5B3CEC@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030217184819.GC7514@redhat.com> "from Christopher Faylor at Feb 17, 2003 01:48:19 pm"
> [reply-to set]
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:38:02PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >>- static const struct interp_procs tk_procs =
> >>- {
> >>- tk_init,
> >>- gdbtk_resume,
> >>- gdbtk_suspend,
> >>- gdbtk_exec,
> >>- gdbtk_prompt_p,
> >>- gdbtk_command_loop,
> >>- };
> >>-
> >>- interp_add (interp_new ("gdbtk", NULL, NULL, &tk_procs));
> >>-
> >
> >FYI,
> >
> >Removing from _initialize*() is wrong. Interpreters should only be
> >registered in _initialize*() function.
> >
> >I think the underlying problem is general confusion over the separation
> >of powers between interp_add() and interp_init().
> >
> >BTW, even with that NULL, it worked for me. Is there something cygwin
> >centric going on?
>
> Don't see how it could be. interp_set does this:
>
> uiout = interp->interpreter_out;
>
> So, at some point uiout becomes NULL. I wiped out my old non-working version
> so I can't give the specific instance right now but it seems obvious that this
> could happen. If you set interpreter_out to NULL and call interp_set at some
> point then uiout will be NULL.
I don't know. Probably didn't use it in anger.
I think the underlying problem is with interp_add(). It shouldn't
even take that ui-out parameter. Instead the ui-out should be set
using some other mechanism (interp_init()?).
Andrew
PS: Note that the current gdbtk_init() relies on the `going to be
deleted real soon now' init_ui_hook.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-18 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-13 22:04 Insight build problem on cygwin Rolf Campbell
2003-02-13 22:43 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-15 22:11 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-17 16:27 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-17 16:49 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-17 17:04 ` Insight build problem on cygwin (tentative patch enclosed) Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 17:48 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-17 18:48 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 18:59 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 19:54 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-18 0:35 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-19 18:02 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-19 18:28 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-19 21:49 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-17 18:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-17 18:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-17 18:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 19:01 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-17 21:25 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-18 3:36 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-02-18 23:32 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-19 22:49 ` Insight build problem on cygwin Keith Seitz
2003-02-19 22:54 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-20 1:05 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-20 2:36 ` Rolf Campbell
2003-02-20 17:55 ` Keith Seitz
2003-02-21 10:16 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030218014014.AAA5B3CEC@localhost.redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=insight@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).