From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <insight-return-4574-listarch-insight=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27281 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2003 13:53:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:insight-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/insight/>
List-Post: <mailto:insight@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:insight-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27258 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 13:53:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.54)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 13:53:29 -0000
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21664;
	Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:53:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h83DrLc17626;
	Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:53:21 +0100
Message-Id: <200309031353.h83DrLc17626@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs
To: mckennad@esatclear.ie
cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
        insight@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: ARM Simulator Bug? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:36:23 BST."
             <3f55c427.298a.0@esatclear.ie> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:53:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2

> Hi Richard,
> 
> I think I have gotten closer to solving my problem. It relates to the linker
> script I use with compilation of gcc. 
> 
> If I take the standard armelf.x from the ldscripts directory and link against
> it my problem disappears. My problem is that I wish to place my reset vectors
> at 0x00 not the standard 0x8000. So I change the line:
> 
>   /* Read-only sections, merged into text segment: */
>   . = 0x8000;
> 
> to
> 
>   /* Read-only sections, merged into text segment: */
>   . = 0x00;
> 
> and my problem resurfaces. At a quick check of my memory contents from gdb at
> 0x00 I get 0x01 as opposed to what I get when I "download" the program using
> Run->Download of 0xEA000015.
> 
> Any ideas?

Not really.   Does "arm-elf-objdump -xd exe-file" display something 
sensible?

R.