From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2056 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2003 22:32:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2049 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2003 22:32:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2003 22:32:54 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 47ED332A8A8; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:32:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 22:32:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Your screenshots are too low res to read when you click on them maby you could have a seperate pic. Message-ID: <20031105223253.GD10292@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: insight@sources.redhat.com References: <20031105163827.27458.qmail@web41215.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031105163827.27458.qmail@web41215.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:38:27AM -0800, josh wojnas wrote: >Your screenshots are too low res to read when you click on them maby >you could have a seperate pic. Uh, what? Is this SPAM? cgf