From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7652 invoked by alias); 13 May 2005 02:09:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7174 invoked from network); 13 May 2005 02:09:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 May 2005 02:09:29 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 4D67013C9F2; Thu, 12 May 2005 22:09:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 02:09:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Steven Johnson , "insight@sources.redhat.com" Subject: Re: Current Status of Insight Message-ID: <20050513020929.GB14106@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Steven Johnson , "insight@sources.redhat.com" References: <428460FB.3090607@sakuraindustries.com> <1115911019.4491.17.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <428504D9.7000609@sakuraindustries.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <428504D9.7000609@sakuraindustries.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:49:45AM -1100, Steven Johnson wrote: >So what your really saying (if i understand your post), is the main >impediment to breathing new life into insight (apart from re-writing >large chunks) is a standard FSF assignment. Sheesh, i think that is >really weak for RedHat's part, given everything they have made out of >the work of the FSF and the GNU Licence. How hard is it to just sign it >over, they obviously dont give two tosses about it, so whats the big >deal. (But i Digress). I think past and current employees of Red Hat would probably agree with you about this sorry state of affairs. Keith, what about a petition to Red Hat? Think that would work? cgf