From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32307 invoked by alias); 13 May 2005 17:45:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32099 invoked from network); 13 May 2005 17:45:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 May 2005 17:45:49 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 5294B13C9F2; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:45:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 17:45:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Current Status of Insight Message-ID: <20050513174549.GC21202@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: insight@sources.redhat.com References: <1115992411.3092.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <4284CB51.1050605@evcohs.com> <20050513171503.GB20585@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:33:41PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: >* Christopher Faylor [13.05.2005 19:15]: >>This is now the second time I've made this observation but people still >>seem to just be responding to the "who's interested" aspect of this >>discussion. To me that's like asking how many people at a ball park >>are there because they're interested in watching a ball game. Of >>course everyone here is interested in insight. The question is what >>are you going to devote to keeping insight alive and healthy? > >Maybe you or someone else which is able to do that can put an >announcement on the Insight website that developers are needed, what to >do and how to get in contact. That's Keith's call. It seems like we should be able to find one or two people who are willing to volunteer out of 160 subscribers, though. >I think this mailing list has a small audience. But: Insight is used in >the embedded segment, and there's no real (GUI) alternative on Windows. >DDD is good but needs X11 and GVD doesn't exist any more. > > >> Btw, I notice an executable in the download area of winavr but I don't >> see any source code downloads. The GPL requires that you provide the >> source code for any executables that you provide. Pointing to another >> web site is not enough, you have to provide the sources. Maybe the >> source code is actually part of the .exe, though, if that is the case >> then nevermind. > >Can you contact WinAVR people? I'm sure they can solve the problem! The message that I responded to said this: "I build Insight/GDB and include it in the WinAVR package: Which is a suite of open source cross development tools targetting the AVR and hosted on Windows. Note that one of the previous releases of WinAVR has had over 42,000 downloads." That would imply that I was already speaking to the WinAVR people. cgf