From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23225 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2007 12:33:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 23206 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2007 12:33:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-248-179-245.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (71.248.179.245) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:33:14 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 38E0E2B369; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:33:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:33:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Dave Murphy , 'Keith Seitz' , Eric Weddington , micros@valvers.com, insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: no insight executable built with target=arm-elf (mingw and ubuntu) Message-ID: <20070629123315.GA5278@ednor> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Murphy , 'Keith Seitz' , Eric Weddington , micros@valvers.com, insight@sourceware.org References: <468257FD.4010904@valvers.com> <4682B85F.80906@redhat.com> <4683BAEE.4070001@valvers.com> <468432CF.3010905@redhat.com> <009401c7b9d5$0b0be510$10745f0a@cso.atmel.com> <46848589.3060709@ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46848589.3060709@ntlworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:07:37AM +0100, Dave Murphy wrote: > Is it reasonable to replace the /dev/com parts with COM or should I check > for cygwin and retain /dev/com there? Cygwin does not consider raw 'comN' strings to be serial ports. That's why the /dev form is used. cgf