From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21990 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2008 18:28:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 21974 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2008 18:28:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:28:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8F02AA043; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:28:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Kj54O5pxmeqX; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:28:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9902AA03C; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:28:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 27382E7ACD; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:28:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Hans Kester Cc: Dave Murphy , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, GDB 6.8] Build Insight correctly on a MinGW system Message-ID: <20080416182817.GA3626@adacore.com> References: <93da74750804110214h4ec5905dpc921157e15b3ae5a@mail.gmail.com> <20080411124212.GA2057@caradoc.them.org> <48020D47.4030303@devkitpro.org> <93da74750804150134h36edcc21j952172d68ecf68a8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93da74750804150134h36edcc21j952172d68ecf68a8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q2/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 > But apparently not in the 6.8 branch since I checked that out and did > not see the patch. Or do I need more coffee? I don't mind that this patch be put on the branch, but IFAIK, the insight release cycle is different from the GDB one - so I was a bit surprised that you tried to build insight from the gdb-6.8 branch. I don't mind either, though. I just didn't know some people were doing this. -- Joel