From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14703 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2009 19:21:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 14684 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2009 19:21:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-173-76-58-89.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.58.89) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:21:35 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB2F13C023; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:21:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 729252B486; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:21:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:21:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] change sources.redhat.com to sourceware.org in gdbadmin/ss dir (was: libiberty configuration for DJGPP) Message-ID: <20090414192117.GA21240@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, insight@sourceware.org References: <83zlejmkgb.fsf@gnu.org> <83skkbmhk6.fsf@gnu.org> <006801c9bd1d$aa40bb40$fec231c0$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006801c9bd1d$aa40bb40$fec231c0$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 06:25:46PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: >I proposed this patch for gdbadmin/ss directory > >Ian tought it was a good idea, and added that I should ask >directly on insight mailing list about this issue I raised: > >I am not really sure about insight reference in README, >as this is still seems to be more a redhat >than a GNU project. > >Should we leave sources.redhat.com for all insight related references >or also switch to sourceware.org? The name of the site really is sourceware.org but insight isn't really officially supported by Red Hat anymore (and hasn't been for years) so I don't see any reason to keep the .redhat.com for insight's sake. If we were talking about something like systemtap or frysk then that would be a different story... cgf