public inbox for insight@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Seitz <kseitz@firetalk.com>
To: Takis Psarogiannakopoulos <takis@XFree86.Org>
Cc: insight@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [QUESTION ON INSIGHT 5.0 ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <396B3177.D0B6F828@firetalk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007110655390.16250-100000@public.xfree86.org>

Takis Psarogiannakopoulos wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Before I start this e-mail I should say: I have a fully functional
> gdb-5.0 on DG/UX. That means:
> threads working fine, (info threads, info threads-status work fine
> from a normal gdb-5.0 command line). In the later case
> "info threads-status" is a new command that is initialized inside
> the target dgux-interface specific file.
> So all what I will ask below is purely about gdbtk directory.
>
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Keith Seitz wrote:
> 
> > Ok, threads support in Insight is kinda lame. If threads work with gdb
> > and you can use the "info threads" command of either the command line
> > gdb or in Insight's console window, then threads should work.
> 
> Yes "info threads" works with both insight-5.0-gdb console window or
> a standard gdb-5.0. It doesnt work from the menu. I modified
> gdbtk/library process.itb and src...text.itb (only files that have
> "info thread" string inside) to --> "info threads".
> Now it come to my mind that info threads is a unique command in a
> standard insight/gdb 5.0 but for the DG/UX target "info thread" is not
> a clear command at all.
> Since here there are two different commands :
> info threads
> info threads-status
> both sharing the common part "info thread" string.
> However insight-5.0 should be clear to gdb when View->Thread List is
> requested. So, it should issue the WHOLE command "info threads"
> and not the shorter "info thread" that is ambigous for gdb-5.0
> with target native DG/UX.

Yes, you're right.  It should use "info threads" and not some
abbreviated form. I don't know why it ever did use an abbreviated form.
That never should have happened.

> 
> > You will probably need to add your target to
> > target_is_native () in gdb/gdbtk/generic/gdbtk.c.
> 
> OK.
> 
> > I believe this is the same as loading a core file, isn't it? (I have
> > never used the 'core' target...)
> 
> I also have never used the target "core" implicitly. But since I couldnt
> load any core (after I had loaded the corresponding executable) from
> the file menu I tried to set implicitly the target to core and this wasnt
> possibe. That is why I asked.
> 
> > You'll need to load the core file from the command line or the console
> > window.
> 
> Mmm. I was under the impression that insight-5.0 will be a little
> more sophisticated.

Unfortunately, Insight was originally developed as an embedded debugger,
and very little has been done with it to really make it work WELL with
native targets. There is a lot of polishing to be done.

> 
> > You simply add your new commands to gdb in the target's tdep file. See,
> > for example, _initialize_v850ice in v850ice.c, which adds a new command
> > "ice" to gdb when this target is used.
> 
> As I said this is already has been done. The question is how I will
> add new commands to the menus of insight-5.0. For example, below
> View->Threads List I would like to have one that reads "Threads Status"
> Now I couldnt find any option inside the insight-5.0 interface that
> the user can add (during runtime) new commands (= new options in
> its menus). I guess insight will keep these new commands (if this
> was possible) to its user dir/.insight file or similar.
> If this is not possible which files should I hack inside the gdbtk
> dir to do that?

Doh! Silly me. Right now, I am uncertain if there is an "easy" way to
add things to menus. We would probably need to add something like gdb's
initialize.c hack to do this. I would suggest just adding the necessary
menus and like to the toolbar directly. If you add a keyboard shortcut
for accessing any new windows, be sure to include those in
srctextwin.itb, too.

The toolbar stuff (and the menus, too) are all entangled inside
gdb/gdbtk/libary/srcbar.tcl and toolbar.tcl. Just follow what is done,
for example, with the function browser or some other window.

I think that's about it, but I may not remember everything. If you run
into any more problems, you know where to find me/us!
Keith

           reply	other threads:[~2000-07-11  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007110655390.16250-100000@public.xfree86.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=396B3177.D0B6F828@firetalk.com \
    --to=kseitz@firetalk.com \
    --cc=insight@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --cc=takis@XFree86.Org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).