public inbox for insight@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>
To: Keith Seitz <kseitz@firetalk.com>
Cc: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>,
	insight@sources.redhat.com, Syd Polk <spolk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Save the last target that the user has connected to?
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39774713.5CCE39D1@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39774571.FCCC6E61@firetalk.com>

Keith Seitz wrote:
> 
> Fernando Nasser wrote:
> >
> > Someone is arguing with me that we should save which target the user has
> > connected to last, so when he launches insight again he does not have to go
> > through the target dialog.
> >
> > In case you haven't notice, all the settings for a certain target are remember,
> > the only thing we "forget" is which of the targets we last connected to.
> >
> > Any reason not to do that?  Can I make this change to make this person happy?
> >
> > Thanks for any comments/advice.
> 
> I think that something like this would probably be okay... Actually, I
> thought that it should be doing this already; the difference, though, is
> that IMO Insight should ALWAYS ask for a target on the first run of a
> session, even if it just means hitting "OK" or return.
> 
> In many of the places I have been and on many of the projects I've
> worked on, I would frequently switch the debugger from target A to
> target B.
> 
> Perhaps we can strike a compromise? By default, don't ask (unless target
> is unknown) and use the last target. A preference, though, could be set
> to make insight ask every (first) time...

Yes, this second option sounds nice.  Some option on the line:
[ ] Show this dialog at beginning of the session

> Or perhaps we can do as Duane suggests: writing out a "project"
> preferences file with this info. I know we discussed doing this several
> times, but we never did. This would seem like a good reason to move
> toward this ideal...
> 

Sure, I agree.  The "project" preference is a very good idea.  We should at least 
add it to the TODO list.  Someone may eventually volunteer to do that.



-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@cygnus.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300           Tel:  416-482-2661 ext. 311
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9              Fax:  416-482-6299

      parent reply	other threads:[~2000-07-20 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200007172124.RAA03249@mercury.franklin.com>
     [not found] ` <39759DFC.E7798EA5@firetalk.com>
2000-07-20 11:16   ` Fernando Nasser
2000-07-20 11:23     ` Duane Ellis
2000-07-20 11:34       ` Fernando Nasser
     [not found]     ` <39774571.FCCC6E61@firetalk.com>
2000-07-20 11:39       ` Fernando Nasser [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39774713.5CCE39D1@cygnus.com \
    --to=fnasser@cygnus.com \
    --cc=insight@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jingham@apple.com \
    --cc=kseitz@firetalk.com \
    --cc=spolk@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).