public inbox for insight@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>
To: Ian Roxborough <irox@redhat.com>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>, insight@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Stack Window Problem [was: Re: DLLs and Insight...]
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 11:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE1A584.C00E8BB9@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BE054E0.9EAA172@redhat.com>

Ian Roxborough wrote:
> 
> bt shows the same as the Insight stack window, i.e. stack
> frames inside the Tk DLL are shown as "??".  Running gdb
> using the "-nw" flags gives the same results.
> 

This ascertains that the GUI is innocent :)

That said, lets see how we can track this down.

> If it is stack corruption, would it be normal to vary between
> similar versions of gdb?
> 

I've never seen the bt output.  Re-reading your message it seems
that you got a sane stack trace -- just the symbolic information
for the portions that are inside the Tk DLL are missing, right?

(Maybe you should post the bt output)

In the past, I had to manually load the DLL symbols in gdb.
After making sure the DLL compiled with debugging symbols
was the only one around and after stopping somewhere after
it was loaded, I used the add-symbol command to load the
DLL symbols in.  After that was done, the backtrace had
all symbolic info on it.

You'll need the load address of the dll.  The syntax is:

add-symbol filename address



-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-01 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-23 10:20 DLLs and Insight Ian Roxborough
2001-10-23 10:27 ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 14:30   ` FYI: DLL breakpoint bug [was: Re: DLLs and Insight...] Ian Roxborough
2001-10-23 14:36     ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 14:59       ` Ian Roxborough
2001-10-23 15:05         ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 15:14           ` Ian Roxborough
2001-10-23 15:21             ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 15:33               ` Ian Roxborough
2001-10-24 13:33             ` Keith Seitz
2001-10-23 10:52 ` DLLs and Insight Fernando Nasser
2001-10-23 11:06 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-10-31  9:24   ` Stack Window Problem [was: Re: DLLs and Insight...] Ian Roxborough
2001-10-31 10:48     ` Fernando Nasser
2001-10-31 11:33       ` Ian Roxborough
2001-10-31 11:53         ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-01 11:42         ` Fernando Nasser [this message]
2001-11-01 12:44           ` Ian Roxborough
2001-11-01 12:48             ` Keith Seitz
2001-11-01 13:01               ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-01 13:20                 ` Ian Roxborough
2001-11-01 14:05     ` Keith Seitz
2001-11-01 15:08       ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-01 15:41         ` Keith Seitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BE1A584.C00E8BB9@cygnus.com \
    --to=fnasser@cygnus.com \
    --cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
    --cc=insight@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=irox@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).