From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20210 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2002 14:37:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20203 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2002 14:37:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2002 14:37:20 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F48F3D9E; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D400D1F.8050609@ges.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 07:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020708 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Korb Cc: tromey@redhat.com, Keith Seitz , insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Insight built correctly on sparc solaris 2.8 References: <3D3ED9EB.9B6812CE@veritas.com> <87adogspf2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <3D4000FD.FD53830D@veritas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-q3/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 > Tom Tromey wrote: > >> > >> >>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb writes: > >> >> Bruce> However, automake is supposed to create generic makes. >> Bruce> The offensive line was, approximately: >> Bruce> mumble.o : ${BUILD_DIR}/grumble.c >> Bruce> and Sun's make does not like "${BUILD_DIR}". >> >> Did automake really generate this line? >> I'd be surprised. Our coding standard is to use $(...), not ${...} >> What directory is this in? > > > Readline. It looks like everywhere "config.h" appears as a > compile dependency _in_that_Makefile_, it appears as > ${BUILD_DIR}/config.h. I do not know how the dependency > was actually generated, because it is in the > distributed "Makefile.in" file. This looks like, in part, a problem in the readline library that GDB imports into the src CVS repository. Can I suggest creating a bug report in: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/ so that the GDB group can track the need to ensure this is fixed in the next readline import (if not earlier). Can I also encourage you to persue this problem with the up-stream readline -- it might even already be fixed. Andrew