From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <insight-return-4022-listarch-insight=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2148 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 20:57:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:insight-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/insight/>
List-Post: <mailto:insight@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:insight-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2141 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 20:57:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 20:57:03 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9DB024074; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:57:00 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E38401B.5080304@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:57:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: Fred Fish <fnf@ninemoons.com>, Chris Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>,
	"insight@sources.redhat.com" <insight@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: current version from CVS fails build
References: <200301292011.h0TKBKdo006048@public.ninemoons.com>	 <3E383C90.7020508@redhat.com> <1043873489.1503.60.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2

> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:41, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> Hmm,
>> 
>> The reason for not removing it was source navigator.  Didn't that 
>> project move its repository?
> 
> 
> All the links in the SN page on sources.redhat.com point to sourceforge.
> Although the download page (on sourceforge) does mention a CVS
> repository at sources.redhat.com, it also mentions one at
> sourceforge.net. I suspect that the recent tcl/tk 8.4 upgrade may have
> screwed them over. I hope that this was discussed between the groups.
> (Alas, I don't recall anything.)
> 
> Of course, I still don't understand why insight's module list must
> contain tix. We're done with it (at long last).

The 5.3 branch and earlier haven't done with it.  Removing would mean 
not being able to fully check out an older version of insight (it would 
also break my release process) :-(

The correct way to remove it is, as Fred suggested, cvs rm ....

Andrew