From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3103 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2003 18:30:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3093 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 18:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 18:30:46 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7B22B89; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:30:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F81B4D5.90003@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 18:30:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton Cc: insight@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] REGISTER_RAW_SIZE => DEPRECATED_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 > Andrew's latest deprecation missed occurrences in insight. Andrew, > can you please test these patches on a tree containing insight? And > if the insight people were to get around to making it possible to > build GDB in a tree containing insight, even if there are compilation > problems on the insight side, that would be greatly appreciated as > well. Don't forget that Insight isn't part of GDB so there's no obligation on the part of GDB's FSF maintainers - you included - to keep Insight building. I do it if I remember. However, I don't do it by default as it adds a significant drain to my volunteer FSF time. Perhaphs Red Hat will finally contribute Insight to the FSF? Andrew