From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: Guillaume Savaton <guillaume.savaton@eseo.fr>
Cc: insight@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Make breakpoint pending
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44105338.20004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4406B226.7090904@eseo.fr>
Guillaume Savaton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using previous versions of insight (5.x) for a while, and I
> have
> noticed a new message in 6.4 when I attempt to run a program :
> "Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load?"
Yeah, that happens when gdb is asked to set a breakpoint someplace that
it knows nothing about (so it assumes that you have not made a mistake
but that the location exists in a shared library).
> This message is quite annoying since I am asked to confirm for each
> breakpoint
> in my program individually.
Okay, I have not seen this before, and I cannot reproduce it with any
testcase I've managed to devise. If you look at the breakpoints which
were marked pending, are they part of your program? [While testing this,
I just ran into a problem where I was running in the build directory.
Insight added the breakpoints from .gdbinit to its list of installed
breakpoints for the executable. Those buggers just coming out of the
woodwork!]
> Is there a possibility to tell insight not to ask ?
Yes, you can add it to the ignored warnings list or teach insight that
it is an ignorable warning (so it will only ask once). See
gdbtk_tcl_warning in interface.tcl to globally ignore the warning.
Unfortunately, teaching insight to optionally ignore the warning, i.e.,
"Don't show me this warning again", is slightly non-trivial (or at least
more painful). GDB never did clean up the warning/error landscape. All
we know is that it is a warning.
Ignoring gdb, we'd have to add logic in place (similar to
gdbtk_tcl_warning) to flag warnings are optionally ignorable. [Gdb just
still doesn't get it.]
Keith
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-22 4:14 Need Help Amarnath
2006-03-02 8:51 ` Make breakpoint pending Guillaume Savaton
2006-03-09 16:09 ` Keith Seitz [this message]
2006-03-09 16:39 ` Guillaume Savaton
2006-03-09 16:45 ` Keith Seitz
2006-03-09 17:08 ` Guillaume Savaton
2006-03-09 17:12 ` Keith Seitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44105338.20004@redhat.com \
--to=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=guillaume.savaton@eseo.fr \
--cc=insight@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).