From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29658 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2006 17:57:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 29650 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2006 17:57:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:57:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2THtH7O001423; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:55:17 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2THtBVH031651; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:55:11 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k2THtATp025373; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:55:11 -0500 Message-ID: <442AC9FD.2030309@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:57:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Ellcey CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: autoconf version of itcl/tcl/tk subdirectories References: <200603271934.LAA05496@hpsje.cup.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200603271934.LAA05496@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 Steve Ellcey wrote: > What about iwidgets and blt? They use the old autoconf too. My > understanding is that they used to be used by insight but no longer are. > Can we remove the iwidgets and blt directories from the src tree? Yes, you are right about those. BLT was never used by Insight (always wanted to use it, though) and iwidgets became a subproject of itcl sometime in the past. So, yes, those projects could be removed. I don't know how overseers feel about that since one might not be able to checkout/build a very old version of insight. You might double-check with overseers@ before removing them. Keith