From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32228 invoked by alias); 17 May 2006 17:55:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 32220 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2006 17:55:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 17:55:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HHtEen025407; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:55:14 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HHtDlT007226; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:55:13 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HHtC66003912; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:55:13 -0400 Message-ID: <446B6380.4050602@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:55:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhail Teterin CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Questioning the withdom of bundling gdb and insight References: <200605162201.33772.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <446B32E2.3080107@redhat.com> <200605171337.30938.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <200605171337.30938.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > ÓÅÒÅÄÁ 17 ÔÒÁ×ÅÎØ 2006 10:27, Keith Seitz ÎÁÐÉÓÁ×: >> Because at one time, we maintained a large number of fixes to tcl, tk, >> and itcl. > > Are these fixes still necessary? Were they submitted to the maintainers of the > tcl, tk, and itcl projects respectively? Can the patches be downloaded > separately for evaluation? Note the wording. ".. at one time .." Our repository currently has 8.4.1 that was released by the Tcl consortium. We have two or three local modifications, but I think it is all configury to deal with /usr/lib vs /usr/share issues. >> The majority wanted the giant tarball: >> >> http://sourceware.org/ml/insight/2004-q4/msg00116.html > > This link points to you asking the question and a SINGLE response from a > person, who admitted to be a ``not a big "consumer of snapshots"''. Hmm. Perhaps that's the wrong thread. Or maybe there were some messages sent to me privately that never made it to the list. I don't recall any more. >> PS. Patches welcome to build using external tcl, tk, itcl... > > I'll build it -- just allow me (and the users of my work) to download only the > pieces needed. I'd like to make a FreeBSD port of insight (and gdb*). I don't have a problem with making insight-only snapshots available. Of course, IMO, anonymous CVS is always available to do this. Keith