From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17914 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2006 20:46:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 17906 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2006 20:46:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:46:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5QKkghT004537; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:46:43 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5QKkgFs012474; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:46:42 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5QKkfLp020884; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:46:42 -0400 Message-ID: <44A047B1.6040805@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:46:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torsten Mohr CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: would this be an improvement? References: <00bf01c68b09$64e9faa0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <200606082216.04515.tmohr@s.netic.de> In-Reply-To: <200606082216.04515.tmohr@s.netic.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 [Oh boy... Been sitting on this for several weeks now...] Torsten Mohr wrote: > thanks for those hints. I guess that will solve it. > I wonder why it is not contained in the latest > insight-weekly. You know, I'd swear that I looked at this, posted a revised patch and asked for someone to double-check it. Alas, I don't see that anywhere. Maybe I'm hallucinating. Anyway, this is insight/253. Looks like 263 could be the same thing. I've commited the patch from the the mail now to make sure I don't forget about this again. I've also put it on the 6.5 branch, and I will cut a 6.5 release today. My apologies to all those annoyed by this. Keith ChangeLog 2006-06-26 Keith Seitz * library/srcwin.itb (_build_win): Add invisible frame to workaround the missing frame problem.