From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30133 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2008 20:43:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 30125 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2008 20:43:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:42:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6EKgahR032152 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:42:36 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6EKgavM011716; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:42:36 -0400 Received: from lindt.uglyboxes.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6EKgXPU027275; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:42:35 -0400 Message-ID: <487BBA39.1050207@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:43:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Insight List Subject: Re: insight build, plus patch request References: <487BAD18.8040607@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: > > Keith> Methinks Insight's usefulness is coming to an end. > > Time for that PyGtk rewrite... :) I already started playing with that. Alas, with the "new" frysk ("new" GDB?) coming up, I am not so sure that it is worth it. Let's face it: Insight is in need of massive rewriting, barely maintained, not developed, and is in licensing limbo. This last con is enough to kill Insight IMO. Heck, it probably *has* been one of the reasons why Insight is so stagnant (at least it is for me). Good case for PyGtk, for sure, but unless I went with 100% GDB/MI implementation (which I don't want to do), I would still need to either rewrite or recycle all the glue code in gdbtk/generic. Once again, it may simply not be worth the effort any more. It might be better to simply contribute to Øyvind Harboe's stand-alone CDT debugger. Keith