From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20547 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2008 20:53:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 20537 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2008 20:53:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:53:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8IKqCmj024418; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:52:33 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m8IKq1Ik011198; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:52:01 -0400 Received: from lindt.uglyboxes.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8IKpvDe008193; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:51:58 -0400 Message-ID: <48D2BF6D.9050109@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:17:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Fine CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Can't debug x86_64 C++ programs. References: <48D024D1.3000107@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <48D024D1.3000107@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 I've finally built x86_64 insight from CVS HEAD. And the news isn't good... I'm going to omit the entirety of your message, because my response is the same on all of them: I could not reproduce the problems you reported -- not one of them. :-( The only problem I was able to reproduce is the pending-breakpoints-crash problem, but there is a patch floating around for that (which I will check in before EOD). I know that's not what you want to hear, but that tells us something: we have a chance at resolving this because it does work for me. I'll respond to your other messages with more detail shortly. Keith