From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <insight-return-6520-listarch-insight=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3033 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2009 23:12:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 3023 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Mar 2009 23:12:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:11:54 +0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) 	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2PNBooe003097; 	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:11:50 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2PNBhaW003218; 	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:11:43 -0400
Received: from lindt.uglyboxes.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2PNBjtA014955; 	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:11:49 -0400
Message-ID: <49CABA30.7020906@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:12:00 -0000
From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
CC: insight@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] ARI fix: remove xasprintf uses
References: <000401c9ad9e$926aca80$b7405f80$@u-strasbg.fr>
In-Reply-To: <000401c9ad9e$926aca80$b7405f80$@u-strasbg.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <insight.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:insight-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/insight/>
List-Post: <mailto:insight@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insight-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-q1/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2

Pierre Muller wrote:
>   This is a rather mechanical patch for which I
> seek acceptance, because I don't know if the obvious rules
> that exist for gdb also apply for insight.

I treat it the same way... I saw your patch on gdb-patches, and I was 
about to make the necessary changes myself, but it looks like you beat 
me to it: Thanks!

>   Is this OK to commit?

Absolutely!

Keith