From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14753 invoked by alias); 6 May 2010 19:55:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 14742 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2010 19:55:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtprelay-h11.telenor.se (HELO smtprelay-h11.telenor.se) (62.127.194.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 May 2010 19:55:38 +0000 Received: from ipb1.telenor.se (ipb1.telenor.se [195.54.127.164]) by smtprelay-h11.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28495EBCD for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 21:55:39 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.230.229.4] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqccAHK74ktV5uUEPGdsb2JhbAAHh2OWHwEBAQE1vhuFEwQ Received: from c-04e5e655.1412-2-64736c12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO [192.168.0.33]) ([85.230.229.4]) by ipb1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 06 May 2010 21:55:34 +0200 Message-ID: <4BE31EB4.6010702@fun-tech.se> Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:55:00 -0000 From: Johan Reply-To: insight@fun-tech.se User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Seitz CC: Ricard Wanderlof , insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Re: Insight development? References: <4BDEFC92.5050505@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BDEFC92.5050505@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 Hi Keith Seitz wrote: > > Active development has pretty much stopped entirely. As far as I know, > I am the only person still actively trying to keep insight crawling > along -- largely because I still use it daily for my work. > > Keith > It sounds like a troublesome situation, and since I'm using it as a nice frontend for OpenOCD (arm jtag to gdb server). I hate to see it die. Maybe it could be easier to get people to give a helping hand if the code was more accessible? I thinking cvs vs. git/subversion question? Maybe it is a good idea to start to use something like github.com? By the way, how dependent on cvs is this project? (Is there a lot of magic happening on the cvs-server?) BR Johan