From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1385 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2010 19:07:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 1376 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2010 19:07:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:07:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7JJ7a7A029097 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:07:36 -0400 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7JJ7XMC020504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:07:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6D80F5.6040309@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:07:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Duignan CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: patch for insight-6.8.1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q3/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On 08/19/2010 11:46 AM, Frank Duignan wrote: > I tried to build insight 6.8.1 for arm-elf and ran into man (terminal) > warnings. These all related to ignored return values from function > calls. I fixed these up and here is the diff. Thanks for the diff. Have you tried a newer version, like a CVS snapshot? [Gdb also "unofficially" available via git, too.] I know there hasn't been much movement on a new "official" release, but I am planning to do something when gdb officially releases 7.2. [FWIW, I've used weekly snapshots of insight+gdb for years. Almost never have a problem.] The diffs you supplied all pertain to gdb's files, and I'll bet these are LONG since solved since 6.8.1. So I did a little digging... From what I can figure out, all the problems with getcwd have been addressed. As has the "write" in utils.c. "dup" is no longer used in inflow.c, so I'm guessing that's fixed, too. That leaves one potential problem in eval.c (initializing the array). I cannot tell you whether this has been addressed or not because the diff doesn't contain enough context information (please use "-u" option to diff next time). I encourage you to try a snapshot or CVS/git checkout to see if any of these problems persist. You should report any further problems to the gdb mailing list (gdb@ instead of insight@). Keith