From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21962 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2010 19:10:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 21954 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2010 19:10:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:10:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBFJARve028719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:10:27 -0500 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBFJAPue007915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:10:26 -0500 Message-ID: <4D0912A0.4070302@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:10:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Trensch CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Insight CVS and MingW References: <4D052C56.9000302@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D052C56.9000302@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On 12/12/2010 12:11 PM, Michael Trensch wrote: > I am currently trying to build a MingW Version of Insight to be able to > debug a ARM evaluation board using openOCD as gdbserver. I was tired of > using cygwin as I got into trouble when multiple applications were using > different cygwin dll's. Thank you for your support. For several weeks now, I've had MinGW working (or at least as much as I've tried). I will dig up my patches later today and post them to this list. So far, your patches look similar to mine. I guess that means I'm not entirely in "left field." :-) Keith