From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23845 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2012 13:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 23585 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2012 13:10:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:10:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2UDA4WC001227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:10:04 -0400 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2UDA1lT025364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:10:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4F75B0A9.1030609@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:10:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing prototype in gdbtk.c References: <4F67221F.2020906@onevision.com> <4F74E9F1.20804@redhat.com> <000701cd0e75$5e028b80$1a07a280$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> In-Reply-To: <000701cd0e75$5e028b80$1a07a280$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 On 03/30/2012 06:02 AM, Pierre Muller wrote: > I hope that I found the reason: > Prototypes apparently require (void) instead of (). That's interesting... > The following patch fixes the problem for mingw32, > > Is this patch OK? > Sure, you could consider a clean-up like that obvious. [I try to use the same "rules" gdb uses. It's what I'm used to.] Thank you, Pierre! Keith