From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32328 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2012 00:12:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 32309 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2012 00:12:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:11:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3J0BIY5012599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:11:18 -0400 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3J0BGcY010281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:11:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8F5823.8050006@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:12:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Schwingel CC: insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH/gdbtk] Fix crash when running insight with pending breakpoints References: <4F8578E5.5070707@onevision.com> In-Reply-To: <4F8578E5.5070707@onevision.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact insight-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: insight-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 On 04/11/2012 05:28 AM, Roland Schwingel wrote: > Changelog: > > 2012-04-11 Roland Schwingel > > * generic/gdbtk-bp.c: Updated copyright. > (gdb_find_bp_at_line): Don't access location struct > of breakpoint if it is NULL. > > Any comments? Is this ok? Yes, please commit. Thank you for the patch! Keith