* Re: grossly out of date???
@ 2012-10-24 6:40 Roland Schwingel
2012-10-24 10:59 ` Dave U. Random
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roland Schwingel @ 2012-10-24 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: insight
Hi...
insight-owner@sourceware.org wrote on 23.10.2012 17:16:01:
> From: Mark Ebersole <markeby@centtech.com>
> To: insight@sourceware.org
> Date: 23.10.2012 17:18
> Subject: grossly out of date???
> Sent by: insight-owner@sourceware.org
>
> Insight is probably the best GUI for gdb ever created however, it is
> grossly out of date. Where are the developers and what replaces it?
You are right in the sense of having a ready to download bundle of
insight. But you can build an own version from CVS (depending on the OS
you want to run it on). I run it here on linux, native win32 and win64
daily from somewhat current gdb sources.
Roland
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: grossly out of date???
2012-10-24 6:40 grossly out of date??? Roland Schwingel
@ 2012-10-24 10:59 ` Dave U. Random
2012-10-24 15:34 ` [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???] Keith Seitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave U. Random @ 2012-10-24 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: insight
> > Insight is probably the best GUI for gdb ever created however, it is
> > grossly out of date. Where are the developers and what replaces it?
>
> You are right in the sense of having a ready to download bundle of
> insight. But you can build an own version from CVS (depending on the OS
> you want to run it on). I run it here on linux, native win32 and win64
> daily from somewhat current gdb sources.
Yes but the daily CVS is often broken. Like now, for instance :-(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???]
2012-10-24 10:59 ` Dave U. Random
@ 2012-10-24 15:34 ` Keith Seitz
2012-10-24 17:24 ` Anonymous
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keith Seitz @ 2012-10-24 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave U. Random; +Cc: insight
On 10/24/2012 03:59 AM, Dave U. Random wrote:
>
> Yes but the daily CVS is often broken. Like now, for instance :-(
>
That's my fault: Lately, I've been doing a lot of debugging (using
insight, of course), and I haven't been keeping up on building from HEAD
as often as I should.
Here is a patch which fixes the build problem. This is the only problem
that I noticed. If there are others, please send a note to the list to
draw my attention to it.
I do try to keep insight building/working.
Keith
ChangeLog
2012-10-24 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
* generic/gdbtk-hooks.c (gdbtk_memory_changed): Update for
API changes.
Index: generic/gdbtk-hooks.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbtk/generic/gdbtk-hooks.c,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -p -r1.56 gdbtk-hooks.c
--- generic/gdbtk-hooks.c 10 Oct 2012 17:28:03 -0000 1.56
+++ generic/gdbtk-hooks.c 24 Oct 2012 15:29:40 -0000
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ static void gdbtk_pre_add_symbol (const
static void gdbtk_print_frame_info (struct symtab *, int, int, int);
static void gdbtk_post_add_symbol (void);
static void gdbtk_register_changed (int regno);
-static void gdbtk_memory_changed (CORE_ADDR addr, ssize_t len,
- const bfd_byte *data);
+static void gdbtk_memory_changed (struct inferior *inferior, CORE_ADDR
addr,
+ ssize_t len, const bfd_byte *data);
static void gdbtk_selected_frame_changed (int);
static void gdbtk_context_change (int);
static void gdbtk_error_begin (void);
@@ -399,7 +399,8 @@ gdbtk_register_changed (int regno)
}
static void
-gdbtk_memory_changed (CORE_ADDR addr, ssize_t len, const bfd_byte *data)
+gdbtk_memory_changed (struct inferior *inferior, CORE_ADDR addr,
+ ssize_t len, const bfd_byte *data)
{
if (Tcl_Eval (gdbtk_interp, "gdbtk_memory_changed") != TCL_OK)
report_error ();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???]
2012-10-24 15:34 ` [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???] Keith Seitz
@ 2012-10-24 17:24 ` Anonymous
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anonymous @ 2012-10-24 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: insight
> Here is a patch which fixes the build problem. This is the only problem
> that I noticed. If there are others, please send a note to the list to
> draw my attention to it.
Thanks for that, I'll try it as soon as I can.
> I do try to keep insight building/working.
I've had bad luck over the past two years with several builds and when it
does build I've had some extremely annoying breakage in assembly language
on Intel x86_64. In 32 bit mode it works great. It will be excellent when
the x86_64 problems are sorted. Thanks for the help.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-24 17:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-24 6:40 grossly out of date??? Roland Schwingel
2012-10-24 10:59 ` Dave U. Random
2012-10-24 15:34 ` [PATCH] Fix build gdbtk-hooks.c problem [was Re: grossly out of date???] Keith Seitz
2012-10-24 17:24 ` Anonymous
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).